ClearRx prescription system, Deborah Adler and Target, 2005Every design profession needs its iconic success story. Architects have the Guggenheim Museum in Bilbao. Product designers have the Apple iPod.
And now, at last, graphic designers have an icon to call their very own: a little pill bottle, about 4 inches tall.
Despite all the claims that designers make for the importance of what they do, it's hard to find examples of successful designs — especially graphic designs — that truly resonate with the general public. Editors face this problem every time they try to assemble a Special Design Issue for a non-design-specialized magazine. You can't make the case for design by showing a lot of esoteric stuff, things that normal people never see, wouldn't understand, or (worst of all) can't buy. So out come the Bilbaos and the iPods, the VW New Beetles and the Oxo Good Grips, accompanied by the usual suspects, Starck and Koolhaas, Ive and Gehry.
Poor graphic design seldom fits the specifications. Even the American Institute of Graphic Arts has a problem with it. Take a look at
"What every business needs," a publication the AIGA has published that, in their words, "explains for your client, whether in-house or external, the role designers and designing can play in problem-solving." In it, the power of design is demonstrated with six examples. Three are products: a yellow Beetle, a slightly out-of-date looking iMac, and an Oxo Good Grips potato peeler. They all look vivid and dramatic, self-evident and even inarguable. Without requiring much explanation, the images alone, instantly familiar all, make a case for design as an important part of everyday life.
The other three are from the world of graphic design. They all look a little vague and mushy. There's the cheerful and messy Amazon.com home page, and the functional but hardly elegant Fed Ex order form: both are iconic because of their ubiquity rather than their questionable formal qualities. The third is the Nike swoosh, an indisputably monumental piece of graphic design that was
commissioned from a Portland State art student for $35. The message to clients seems to be that where graphic design is concerned, take your pick: useful but dull, or mysterious and cheap.
Then along came Deborah Adler, the designer of the ClearRx pill bottle.
In the tradition of
Maya Lin, the design for the Clear Rx package was a student project, conceived in the innovative
MFA design program at New York's School of Visual Arts. A press release from SVA describes the project's genesis:
Adler first had the idea to redesign the standard amber-colored prescription bottle when her grandmother accidentally swallowed pills meant for Deborah's grandfather. Adler quickly came to the conclusion that the prescription bottle was not just unattractive — it was actually dangerous. Motivated by a desire to make people's lives easier and safer, in 2002 she designed a comprehensive system for packaging prescription medicine as her Master's thesis. "I wanted to design the bottle so that when you open up your medicine cabinet, you instantly know which is your drug, what the name of the drug is, and how to take it," says Adler. The results are a redesigned prescription and communication system that, which includes: the redesigned bottle, easy-to-read label, removable information card, color-coded rings and redesigned warning icons.As someone who has tried for years to interest the general public in graphic design without much success, I can tell you straight out that this story has it all. The subject is a common object with which nearly everyone is familiar, and with which everyone is frustrated to boot. The problem to be solved is not mere ugliness (although an amber-colored prescription bottle
is ugly) but literally a matter of life or death. Even the moment of inspiration is appealing: who can't relate to the story of those confused grandparents, and cheer when graphic design comes to the rescue?
And cheer they have. The story of Adler's bottle has been featured in nearly fifty publications, from
Business Week, Plastics News and
Pharmacy Today, to the
Providence Sunday Journal, the
Pittsburgh Tribune-Review, the
Rocky Mountain Telegram and the
Honolulu Advertiser. New York Magazine gave the humble package a lavishly illustrated feature story,
"The Perfect Prescription," that provided the kind of step-by-step exegesis that magazines usually reserve for more important subjects like apartment renovations. Adler was interviewed on
National Public Radio and will speak next month at the
Cooper-Hewitt National Design Museum. The bottle is featured in the Museum of Modern Art's first major design exhibition in its new galleries,
"Safe: Design Takes on Risk." And surely there will be another wave of publicity when
"From Master's Thesis to Medicine Cabinet," an exhibition at SVA's Westside Gallery, opens later this week.
Much of this media frenzy has been due in large part to the project's receipt of the ultimate benediction in a market economy: the bottle will be used as the standard pharmacy package at, of all places,
Target. The discount retailer is widely regarded as the corporate world's leading design advocate, assuming the halo worn previously by IBM, Apple and Nike. (Surely in the next edition of the AIGA business design guide, the circle-and-dot will replace the swoosh, no doubt further baffling potential clients who wonder why anything that looks so easy is worth that much fuss.) Target, who Adler contacted through an AIGA connection, paired her with industrial designer
Klaus Rosburg; Adler gratefully credits him with making the project a reality, along with Target Creative Director Minda Gralnek and a support team of over 100 people.
I must confess I did not know Target even had a pharmacy. It's a bit buried on their
homepage, down near the bottom in a box hyping their photo studio and grocery coupons. But evidently they do, and they are obviously
staking a lot on the competitive advantage that ClearRx will provide. Once you find the pharmacy on the website, it's all about the the bottle, and not just the design but the story behind it. We meet the designer, and note the use of the singular: Target knows from their experience with Graves, Starck and Mizrahi that this is no time to dwell on the kind of large and complex team which brings any beautiful design to the marketplace. So it's in Adler's own voice that we get the now-familiar genesis story. And we also get some nice new touches, including the news that the grandparents have similar names — Helen and Herman — which further accounts for the inadvertant drug-swapping that started the whole thing. From such details are legends made.
Despite all the legend-making, however, there's no mistaking the bottom line: Target, to their credit, knew a superior design when they saw it, worked hard to bring it to market, and are banking on their conviction that it will get them customers. And if ClearRx is a success, you can be sure that no one will be happier than the graphic design community. Starved for years for persuasive proof that graphic design can make a difference, we finally have an icon to call our own. It looks good and it makes the world a better place. It's perfect. I predict we'll see a lot —
a lot — of it in the years to come. I just hope we don't overdose.
Comments [39]
Good graphic design doesn't just need an excellent designer stuffed with common sense; to be successful, an intelligent client is also a pre-requisite.
I'm glad Adler found the perfect combination!
10.24.05
06:34
More importantly, I'm happy that Ms. Adler has contributed Design Functionality Worthy of Praise.
She has resolved the problem with the Caps not only the Graphics.
Unlike so many other Designers undeserving of their Recognition and Praise whom have actually contributed nothing.
Ms. Adler has Raised the Bar in Critical Thinking in American Design Problem Solving Activity.
As an Advocate for Women in Design Ms. Adler is a Ray of Sunshine of Hope and Prosperity that Women in Design Stand beside their Male Contemporaries. And have never walked behind them.
And Proud Poppa Milton Glaser Cheers on from the sidelines.
I'm happiest the project was given birth out Milton Glaser's Office.
DM
10.24.05
12:55
10.24.05
02:11
10.24.05
02:22
10.24.05
03:53
But my real concern is this: as HIV+ I take a fair amount of pills. I've kept every single pill bottle in hopes of eventually doing something creative with them. But the other bottle is iconic. And so I think works better as part of an art show. But the new ClearRx is drool worthy and important as design.
So I'm torn -- ditch the amber for the new? Or keep the old bottle? (Of course, a fair amount of my pills come in the containers made by the pharmaceutical companies, too.)
Sigh. What's a designer to do?
10.24.05
04:39
Presumably, this has been tested and the results accurately reported?
10.24.05
04:45
Like a lot of great design it has all design disciplines represented.
It is well designed and graphic design has claim, but solely a graphic design icon?
10.24.05
04:46
10.24.05
05:34
Also it does become awkward in that it adds one more step in the whole process of administering a pill, plus adding the whole color coding thingy. Pick it up, flip it over, fish it out, flip it back over then return it to the shelf. Versus the traditional method of picking it up, fishing out the pill and then returning it back to the shelf.
As stated the ergonomics & legibility of an existing pill bottle were the ones that needed to be addressed here, rather than the basic premise of the pill bottle as a form.
While aesthetically appealing and certainly unique as compared to the old standard this design begs the question of form vs. function and is it really all that successful in that regard?
10.24.05
06:09
And no other pharmacies are going for it because Target purchased the patent, not because they don't want/like it.
10.24.05
08:03
First, Someone should redesign the packaging for the pill box. There won't be as much fanfare, as this isn't a matter of life and death - and its timing, coming after the ClearRx design, will seem obvious.
It baffles me every time I get a box of Claritin or Benadryl when I have to tear open the box, slide out a sheet of foil-backed plastic, tear off one or two pills, remove the outer layer of foil by prying up one of the corners, then finally pushing my medicine through the remaining foil, only to push too hard and end up picking my pill up off the floor.
I might take a stab at this in my spare time.
Secondly, on the importance of our profession: I cringe every time I have to design an email for a large retail client of ours. Emails seem very unimportant, but on certain occassions (holiday time) will generate millions of dollars for our client, and that's pretty important.
10.24.05
08:12
10.24.05
11:13
From the patent standpoint of the ClearRX what is it that was actually patented? Was it the system (which is far too complicated for its own good, too many things to remember and kind of reminds me of DHS's color coded threat level ) or is it the specific reverse orientation of the bottle itself?
While the focus on the clearer presentation and information structure is certainly a welcome change, creating more legible warnings and changing the typeface hardly justifies all of this commotion.
10.24.05
11:43
I think it is funny how the New Beetle and the original iMac are the big examples of the all-powerful glory of design. I've never used a more poorly-designed computer in my life than the original iMac. It looks cool and everything, but my god that thing was a horrible little monster to actually use. The screen was tiny, it sat uncomfortably low on a desk, the disk drives never worked, and it was slow as hell. That's what is annoying about designers -- we always talk about how necessary what we do is, then we give examples like the New Beetle and iMac. If that's the case, we're showing the world that design isn't about clarity, communication, people, making things that matter to someone, informing, crafting a good all-around experience, or any of that. Instead, we're showing the world that design is about applying our funky-fresh style to things.
What is refreshing about the new pill bottle is that Adler attempted to solve some actual observed problems, instead of just putting a dress on the existing pill bottle. It's not good design because it's less ugly than a regular pill bottle. If that was the case, she should have just made it bubbly and lime green -- it seemed to work for all of our other cherished design icons.
10.25.05
02:50
Also, big tablets get jammed in the narrow end (the top).
This is a cool design solution but also not a practical one for people who are "power users" of pharmecutical products.
10.25.05
06:28
Another example from history is the London Underground map created by Henry C. Beck in 1933.
While people may respond emotionally or subconsciously to a great logo, poster, ad, or album cover, they may not be able to discuss why it affects them. Great information design gives a non-designer a place to enter the discussion. Great information design becomes an indispensable part of a product or service.
While there may be improvements yet to be made to Adler's design, it's hard to argue the value that this new approach brings to people's lives.
10.25.05
08:40
But as designers (whether id, communication or informational) our work needs to be viewed not out of context but as a whole. Label, bottle systems et al.
In this instance the overall project fails, not because it's solved a labelling problem (for which it deserves commendation) but simply because it's far more difficult to operate than its predeccessor.
10.25.05
10:33
Adler's redesign of medication bottling, taken as a whole, or by parts, is absolutely a giant step for both the medical and design worlds.
Any designer who fails to recognize this needs to pop an eye-opener.
10.25.05
10:49
10.25.05
11:29
10.25.05
02:19
10.25.05
02:20
10.25.05
04:17
10.25.05
04:22
For another version of the pill bottle. Check out the Tylenol bottle by fuseproject over at Core77.com. It's a great solution as well.
As for Target, the Pharmacy in the larger stores is near the front and as places like WalMart (a competitor) are heavily into their pharmacy business: this is a way for them to differentiate themselves. I personally don't buy my meds in places like that and prefer a pharmacy for people with long term care issues, but these are not located around the country (U.S.) like Targets.
10.25.05
04:44
10.25.05
09:53
Right behind me, a lady was hit by and fell under a van with her bike. I called for an ambulance as some other people got her out from under the truck and we all realized with great relief that she had gotten away with "only" a crushed arm and some scratches.
I then held my arms around her to keep her warm and the broken arm steady until the ambulance came, a simple action that made me feel more needed than I ever have as a professional graphic designer.
Perhaps this bottle is as close as it gets to that feeling.
10.26.05
02:28
10.26.05
10:27
And as far as a pill bottle being an icon for graphic designers, that something I hope does not happen, no offense to Adler, that's just my biased opinion.
10.26.05
10:46
Also, I agree that we should NOT declare this product the "icon for graphic designers", let's not get a little to ahead of ourselves here.
10.26.05
01:13
10.27.05
02:39
10.27.05
02:59
I have not read all of the posts, but to share my thoughts on the bottle: why is red better than amber? related to the color blind comment by aj: yes, and alzheimers sucks too.
I agree with Robs 'idle hands' comment.
Unfortunately I am not so excited about the product. I heard a story on NPR a while back about the talking pill bottle http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=4779825 - now I thought that was great! These two bottle designs should get together and make babies.
10.31.05
11:31
No research can guess all the problems that may arise. Time will tell.
This is why good design should never be automatically linked to successful design initially (and vice versa).
11.04.05
11:22
One of our most valuable skills as designers is being able to identify needs / problems and as a student, I don't understand why the world works as it does with most design work being commissioned by people with little or no design understanding.
A lot more effective work would be produced if we took the initiative and looked more at where the problems lie, instead of waiting for briefs.
11.16.05
11:20
03.21.06
04:50
I LOVE them. I've got several now, and as a sometime graphic designer, a once pharmacy technician and long time patient I was overjoyed with these new bottles.
The bands are brillant for most families, and I love the clear labeling. I'm happy with the upside down design, and while some of my pills might get caught in the narrow end, a quick shake sets them loose - much like the shakes I used to give the amber bottles to get a pill out of them. My first thought upon seeing these was, "Think of all the geriatric patients who won't mix up their meds with their spouses."
I couldn't be happier with this, and I think as a design - it's brillant.
06.29.06
03:19
08.01.06
10:03
08.16.06
06:55