Barnbrook Bible, cover, 2007.Jonathan Barnbrook's new book,
Barnbrook Bible, ranks amongst the most ambitious personal projects undertaken by any graphic designer. It is a 330-page monograph bursting with dazzling refinement. Throughout the entire book there isn't a clumsy or unrefined typographic gesture not a line that hasn't been weighted to perfection. The effect is like being in a Parisian patisserie everywhere you turn there are mouth-watering options.
But the
Barnbrook Bible is more than a bit fat monograph. It is a work of semi-autobiography, expressing the author's political anger and his aesthetic and professional philosophies. It therefore invites judgement by more demanding criteria than if it was just another design book. So, the big question is: does Barnbrook's magnum opus represent a species-jumping leap for graphic design, or is it the outpourings of a massive ego shot through with political rage and a fondness for typographic cartooning?
Barnbrook Bible, sample spread, 2007.The
Barnbrook Bible which took 5 years to complete is a comprehensive re-engineering of the designer's back catalogue, beginning with his student work and coming up to date with his
Adbusters involvement. The book avoids a conventional structure; instead it is a fast-flowing river of textual and visual rhetoric. But "river" is a poor word to use in connection with the solemn precision of Barnbrook's work. He produces finely tooled graphic wizardry that distinguishes him from all other graphic designers at work today. He can mix a dozen fonts (all his own) on a single page sometimes even changing typefaces mid-sentence and it still looks coherent and exquisitely judged.
The spectre of religion hangs over this book. It begins with the odd-sounding note of the title and continues inside with Barnbrook's extensive use of religious symbolism and typographic conventions associated with English religious texts;
Eric Gill's stark red-and-black typographic creed lives on in
Barnbrook's design. The aesthetic flavour of Barnbrook's work is acutely English. It is the flavour of gravestones in rural churchyards, of dusty prayer books and the vivid lustre of stained glass windows. This iconography links Barnbrook to a traditionalist view of Englishness that is increasingly rare in multicultural Britain, and more commonly associated with reactionary conservatism.
Barnbrook Bible, sample spread, 2007.Which brings us to Barnbrook's political commentary. Barnbrook is a political radical: American foreign policy and global corporatism are his main targets. Most of this work is self-initiated and self-funded. Much of it is sharply effective but there is also a callowness to it. Morphing Ronald MacDonald and Osama Bin Laden into a single iconic character is witty and diverting for about 3 seconds; although perhaps it has a higher purpose which is to infuriate corporate America and Al Qaeda supporters.
This callowness means it's easy to dismiss Barnbrook's political work as typographic cartooning (planes flying into perpendicular barcodes, for example), yet the sheer brilliance of his execution prevents us from doing this. In the past, revolutionary and oppositional movements have distinguished themselves by shunning formal graphic design because of its links to political and corporate power, and turned instead to more anarchic modes of graphic expression. But Barnbrook brings the gloss and ultra-refinement of cosmetics advertising to the task of exposing U.S. bombing statistics. It's an astonishing conjuring trick that he pulls off repeatedly.
Barnbrook Bible, sample spread, 2007.The final component in this book is Barnbrook's text. There are essays by Alice Twemlow, Teal Triggs, Kalle Lasn, Emily King and "three paragraphs by David Bowie," but the book mainly consists of Branbrook's own extensive writings which appear on nearly every page. He writes engagingly about font creation, his discovery of film-based work, and the conduct of the modern designer. His chapter on working with
Damien Hirst is a cracking read.
I said earlier that this was a work of semi-autobiography. It is more accurately a work of "professional" autobiography, by which I mean that Barnbrook mainly confines his autobiographical observations to his work, and only fleetingly touches on personal matters. Nevertheless, he opens himself up for critical scrutiny in the way that all good autobiographers do. There's no self-love, no self-aggrandisement just an old-fashioned obsession with right and wrong, good and evil, black and white. This occasionally manifests itself as sourness and personal bitterness; his dismissive response to objections to the
Manson typeface is a good example of this.
I've recently got to know Barnbrook. Prior to meeting him I'd imagined him to be a stern moralist unlikely to be good company. Yet in the flesh Barnrook is an engaging, modest and uncensorious individual with a sly wit and an eccentric affection for
Luton Town Football Club just about the most unfashionable football club in football-mad Britain.
Barnbrook Bible, sample spread, 2007.Something of the dour moralist (Alice Twemlow identifies it as a mixture of "anger, bitterness and melancholy") lingers in the pages of this book. But something else also emerges: an inspirational notion of sacrifice and self-denial. Barnbrook could make a great deal of money if he harnessed his ability to aestheticize everything he touches. Had he wanted to, he could have launched himself as the supreme stylist of his generation. Instead, he chose to follow his own path of dogged opposition to everything he despises. This seems to me to be brave heroic even in an age when we deny ourselves nothing, and refuse to make any personal sacrifices unless we are well paid.
Barnbrook is a throwback to an almost medieval notion of ascetic denial. He just does it with enough graphic flair to fuel a small power station.
Barnbrook Bible: The Graphic Design of Jonathan Barnbrook will be released in September. Published by Rizzoli, it is available from Amazon US and Amazon UK.
Comments [64]
07.30.07
09:45
Three cheers for Jonathan Barnbrook.
07.30.07
11:31
07.31.07
09:39
07.31.07
10:27
Barnbrook's style has always been gorgeous. It's a subjective thing, of course, but I'll agree that his attention to detail is hard to equal. Everything he creates has a remarkable level of polish and sophistication.
Without having seen the book up-close, I can't comment to any meaningful degree, but, I will say that there's nothing original about "political anger" amongst righteous graphic designers. So what. Following a liberal persuasion doesn't make your opinion any more valid than somebody else's. And I continue NOT to understand what's so wonderful about doing things out of rage and spite; it beats indifference, but taking the positive route (for lack of a better term at this time in the morning) has a much stronger chance of actually affecting something. It's just a lot harder and a lot less sexy.
07.31.07
10:46
07.31.07
11:37
One has to wonder then, if the book will become as dated as the political poster art of the USSR. Lampooning current political subjects might make for witty and easy targets but illustrating the human condition is more of what I would expect in a "bible". Since I already own Kitaj's First Diasporist Manifesto, I think I have enough bibles from artists that I otherwise admire for their work.
07.31.07
12:06
This has been addressed. See the question from Luke Prowse.
Frankly, I would've been surprised to see this not titled something like "Bible." Even the most superficial familiarity with Barnbrook's work(or hey, a ten-second glance at his sites) would obviate this question.
07.31.07
12:45
I've seen some recent Cranbrook work (that doesn't move me) in this same vein.
07.31.07
01:16
And what 'vein' would that be?
Please expound.
If you are going to call out the collective work of a particular institution, I hope your explanation is both articulate and knowledgeable.
07.31.07
01:32
Sorry to be such a downer.
07.31.07
01:58
Morphing Ronald MacDonald and Osama Bin Laden into a single iconic character is witty and diverting for about 3 seconds. It stops there, no further explanation or excuse. I've stopped looking for an excuse as to why I dislike the work. It's hollow.
07.31.07
02:21
When I was a very young designer I was very obsessed with the cran/barnbrook aesthetic, and later I found that the reason I was so crazy about it was exactly because of its aggressively beautiful yet ambiguous character. I always felt like the designer knew something I didn't, which now seems like a sort of power play, a sort of excluding rock star gesture.
I think there is immense value in conceptual ambiguity in art. This might be halfway acceptable if someone decided that it belonged in the art world, but even as something other than design, you are right, morphing mcDonald into osama is pretty much, well... boring.
07.31.07
03:24
The clear suggestion is that, thanks to his aforementioned dogged pursuit, he is somehow better, more noble, than we poor hacks who are trying to make a living at design.
Rubbish.
As it happens, I rather despise the notion that some designer should be held up as a paragon of virtue, an example to us, because he published a completely self indulgent $50 book--probably in hopes of making some money.
Others have called him a "wanker," and I am inclined to agree. Of course, I can pursue my own dogged pursuit of things I despise and not buy his book. That'll help Barnbrook meet his noble goal of not making money. Now I'm a hero too.
07.31.07
03:25
client= generally, person who cannot do the work but has the money to tell you what to do; most possibly and probably a real wanker.
07.31.07
04:53
C'mon, "The Barnbrook Bible" can be dismissed with a few sentences because it comes off as terribly lazy and inconsequential, all the while calling itself a Bible. The careers of the people you mentioned can't in any way be dismissed that easily. Glaser's books, for instance, are PACKED with incredibly well-thought out and executed work, no matter what you think of his style (the guy is a product of his time, he can't do anything about that). Scher's book, too, is full of work as well as a well-thought-out text. The Barnbrook book is literally one of the weakest, most padded monographs I've ever seen, all the while employing the strongest, most polemical language (both text and image).
I think I'm just falling for the bait here.
07.31.07
05:52
I havent read the book, but I just wonder, what contribution does this make? Another graphic design bloodbath of work that is supposedly rebellious as well? The notion that a critical practice vs. a corporate practice are mutually exclusive is a bit dated. Typography is something that is inherently tied to the rise of capitalism, not to mention the dissemination of Christianity around the globe. Opposition and dissent against everything you despise using the same tools that everything you despise uses without any self-reflection, its a bit adolescent and 90s isnt it? It would be interesting to see publications on design that situate practice in the complexities of the real world, and how does a critical practice emerge through work?
07.31.07
06:48
and i will post a response to some of the 'interesting issues' which have been highlighted in the comments here in the next day or two
07.31.07
07:40
They are not the only ones to take this position, neither is theirs the only route available, but they do present a good example of a commitment to a decision. They have drawn a line in the sand and said 'no, I will not support your cause', and have also said 'yes, we think we can help your struggle'. Placed in the vice like grip of economic forces they have of course stumbled and contradicted themselves - but to notice only that is to miss the point. Indeed, what is so admirable, in any such work that concerns itself with the world, is facing the consequences of that decision - in balancing what is of necessity (e.g. paying the rent) with what is desired (e.g. destruction of property). This is no easy task.
So, rather than hearing the boom of an hierarchical authority, ascetic condemnations, or righteous judgements we could listen more carefully for the call of friendship. For the work desires to be part of a larger dialogue (hence the book), one that seeks to engage (and in turn find itself engaged also), with a deeper, richer, ethical approach to design and the world at large.
Therefore, rather than simply dismissing out of hand the position taken by Jonathan and others, we should look at actively developing these approaches and ideas. After all, isn't that what creativity is about?
07.31.07
07:45
A 'wanker' is someone who resorts to providing their own gratification at the expense of, shall we say, engaging with the world - the very opposite of Barnbrook's practice, but the very model of those here who are offended by engagement.
Dismissing oppositional ideas as somehow '90's' (whenever a designer with a stunted imagination wants to trivialise or damn something he consigns it to a previous decade) or 'adolescent', is utterly reactionary - now, more than ever, we need alternatives to the distraction and destruction.
That you're 'just trying to make a living' doesn't make you a 'poor hack' - it's more likely your generic work, social irrelevance, historical myopia and inability to imagine other possibilities that does that.
07.31.07
08:00
Wiser words have rarely made into a DO thread. Thanks, Jason.
Dismissing Jonathan Barnbrook as a style maven is perverse and ignorant; I can't think of a designer whose use of form is better allied with content. Sure, there are a few tropes that he has used multiple times, but even a cursory glance at his work (check out Why2K, or his Damien Hirst monographs) reveals a designer who's willing to do anything to make a point. Regardless of how you feel about his signature style, you have to appreciate the effort.
I'm really looking forward to this book, even if Mark Melnick feels it's weak and padded (adjectives I've heard applied -- not by me -- to his Chip Kidd monograph).
07.31.07
09:59
You're joking, right?
I can't wait to see this follow-up.
I do have to say that the review itself unfortunately indulged in a bit of pedestal-building that maybe did a little to incite this.
07.31.07
10:59
08.01.07
09:06
What I bristle at is the fawning hero worship contained in the original post. It's not a really a very good review. It doesn't offer any insightful commentary about Barnbrook's work. It offers nothing instructive or informative. Nope. The take away message is that I should admire this brilliant designer/hero. I should go out and buy his book as soon as I can. Because Barnbrook is just so damn great. The review reads like the work of some Barnbrook sycophant, and I am appalled by it.
I did not actually comment on Barnbrook's work before. Well, accept to affirm the wanker characterisation. That's about the fact that he's just published a book that, on the face of it, appears to be very self indulgent. No, I have not seen the book, and I am therefore not qualified to say much about his work. To do so would be just be silly.
08.01.07
09:11
08.01.07
09:13
08.01.07
09:20
08.01.07
09:53
There is very good work in the book, undoubtedly. As I said in an email to Jonathan himself, the Hirst book was enormously influential on graphic design trends, Adbusters, too. His typefaces practically defined a certain period of graphic design.
However, one excellent piece of work for every ten pages of - in my opinion - gradients and slogans does not make for a "species-jumping leap for graphic design".
I'm sorry if I find the other stuff to be "filler", but I do. The fact that that material also employs such highly-charged, "revolutionary", fuck-the-system rhetoric just makes it all the more empty to me. I think it's glib to attempt to meaningfully elucidate anything about world affairs with clip art of corporate logos and diagrams of Dick Cheney's oil connections. I honestly feel the same way about the "Nozone: Empire" issue, though I loved their execution. Also, "Nozone: Empire" wasn't put up for critique, Jonathan's book was.
The folks who designed that donut-shaped water container, where refugees can put a rope thru it & wheel it back to camp? THAT'S revolutionary design, or at the very least it's ingenious work that makes a real impact on people without having to wrap itself in one iota of hyperbole. By contrast, I think we can all agree that clever vector art will likely do little to afflict the comfortable.
I know full-well I'm just another privileged white guy, sitting at my computer, reading the paper, trying to wrap my head around why the wheels of society seem to have come off. I have no doubt Jonathan wonders about the very same thing. It's just that, in the end, I find that his book offers nothing more than a bombastic pose for an answer.
08.01.07
10:00
08.01.07
11:19
08.01.07
02:02
08.01.07
03:23
We have removed a comment for offensive language. Its author has been informed. We'd like to remind all commenters of the guidelines for this site: "We encourage comments to be short and to the point, and to be courteous to others in the discussion. We discourage comments that are unnecessarily antagonistic."
The Editors
08.01.07
06:10
What caught my attention first about this book is that the cover has a very nicely hidden translation of the title in Arabic at the top right-hand corner, and it looks like a road signs commonly used in most Arab countries.... I am sure if Jonathan can see our newly developed Khatt Foundation set of Arabic fonts, he would've liked to use them for his cover. Maybe for his next book. I personally cannot wait to have this book and to review it on our Khatt Network for Arabic Typography.
Good work and all the best to Jonathan Barnbrook.
08.02.07
02:36
08.02.07
08:16
I wonder how Mr. Barnbrook feels about being the object of hero-worship. The "Bible" in the title is funny though; I remember being at an AIGA party, I think for the Voice Conference years ago, and he was actually signing a Gideon's Bible or some such for a student. I don't know the man, but from what I saw of him at that conference, he came across as quite humble.
Drone and Tourette are lovely typefaces and I'm thrilled that they exist.
But let's be real here. Graphic design has extremely limited impact on the political process, and while I certainly don't seek to denigrate it, overstating its effect is foolish.
08.02.07
12:41
Aren't these the same designers always shouting that design can help shift units, grow profits, and transform businesses?
But can we have it both ways? Can the economic impact of commercial design really fail to make a cultural impact in a culture of hyper-capitalism. And is it reasonable to tell designers like Jonathan that their work is useless if it is directed at cultural not commercial outcomes?
From the depths of the Amazonian jungle, to the deserts of the Australian interior, to the villages and cities anywhere on the planet, design suggests, persuades and advocates for an ideology that is actually killing us. At this moment in history is there a more ubiquitous vehicle for the dominant ideology than design?
Work like Jonathan's is difficult for some because it honestly acknowledges that (whether we admit it or not) we are right now designing our future.
08.02.07
10:17
08.03.07
05:40
08.03.07
06:02
Lots of heat, little light. Par for the course here unfortunately. Interesting how living designers seem to receive the most opprobrium (see the Neville Brody thread from a few years back). They'll all love you when you're dead, Jonathan.
08.04.07
12:10
Tom.
08.04.07
12:26
08.05.07
04:53
08.05.07
10:42
08.06.07
08:09
He could have a massive studio with 50 designers working for him but he chooses to keep small and do small projects. It is not about the money is about doing work that he believes in.
And Yes, graphic design can help facilitate change. The world - outside these walls - needs creative minds to find different solutions to the problems we now face. Discussion is only the beginning. As soon as we start putting the definitions of graphic design inside a box in a museum we will cease to find new boundaries and bridges.
I am glad some people are still trying to create alternative routes and are trying to make something more out of graphic design.
08.07.07
08:47
I am glad that Barnbook has been able to maintain such a consistency, intelligence and integrity in his vision of graphic design. It makes it all that much more interesting to theorize about how he sees the world, and, how I see the world through his eyes, his work.
I think that graphic design's ability to "change the world" is a spurious enterprise. Like many others, I dropped that (Modernist) potato when I was in architecture school and I see the same influence of capital at work in graphic design. The most that we can hope for is a critique of the world, of the cultural and capital structures that maintain the status quo. It is that same status quo seen above that dismisses Barnbrook's work as effete.
"Good" theory does not leave the object of its scrutiny unchanged. Barnbrook's work shows us that the perfection that we desire--and that graphic design reinforces--is illusory. His work is tight. Slick. Elegant. It is loud. It mummers. It knowingly winks from across the room while holding a stem of bordeaux. His work gives us what we want. It is an immediate high coupled with that immediate hangover that we justly deserve for our societal abuses.
I'm looking forward to that high and I am willing to pay the price for my indulgence: reflection, self-assessment and just maybe, a better understanding of my own complicit nature in reinforcing the flaws of society.
08.08.07
12:10
08.08.07
04:04
08.08.07
05:34
which is it really? come on - take a stand...
08.09.07
04:02
I didn't find it available on Amazon yet (still a pre-order).
Maybe commenting after actually overlooking the book in it's entirety would make more sense?
It will give you more to judge if anything.
08.09.07
09:58
08.09.07
11:25
really? how so?
08.09.07
07:10
They had no computers to speak of but a trained eye and Typesetting tweaked with brush,pen,photostat machine and an exacto knife.
Barnbrooks designs resemble old coloring books.
08.10.07
05:25
08.13.07
02:07
I think it's healthy for the design profession to have opinions and a voice like his around.
08.14.07
05:43
08.30.07
03:55
a comment from Mr Carson that's about as constructive as his work is relevant...
I'm a student, so will you post this on your self congratulatory website with all the other fawning messages, Mr Carson? I noticed afterall that they're starting to thin out...
09.12.07
12:34
09.30.07
03:11
09.30.07
03:15
At least his way is his way.
10.24.07
12:26
7 months later...
03.04.08
11:15
yeah right, and of course you would be really happy to respond after you had the got the level of childish abuse that he has here. he probably thinks its pointless and i would say he is right.
04.27.08
09:15
9 months later...
04.28.08
02:44
Instead of picking at holes in Barnbrooks Bible I choose to take from it what I liked. For me his typefaces.
But what do I know,
Im just a student...
06.25.08
08:22
04.25.09
06:54